Thursday, April 17, 2025

LegalEagle contrasts 'Signal War Plans vs. Hillary's Emails' for Throwback Thursday

Happy Throwback Thursday! For today's brief look back, I'm sharing LegalEagle with Liz Dye comparing and contrasting Signal War Plans v.s. Hillary's Emails.

One of these things is not like the other...So when exactly did the military stop classifying time and package of air strikes?
I took a silly look at "Whiskeyleaks" in 'SNL' mocks the Signal group chat in its cold open and Weekend Update, which LegalEagle clipped. It was time I took a serious look at it, along with revisiting a controversy I thought I'd dispensed with nine years ago, Hillary Clinton's emails, although it led to me writing Trump and Putin, a bad bromance, which I last linked to in Kosta, Colbert, and Meyers take closer looks at tariffs on Flashback Friday two weeks ago. I still have my suspicions about that relationship and how it's influencing Donald "Hoover Cleveland" Trump's actions. Also, the accusations against Secretary Clinton turned out to be another example of projection being the Right's favorite defense mechanism. That's turned out to be even more true 13 years later.

Enough of these scandals. Follow over the jump for a retrospective of the top post featuring LegalEagle during the 2024-2025 blogging year.


I shared LegalEagle says Don't call it the 'Super Bowl!' from February 9, 2025 at the Citizen Connect/Coffee Party Facebook page, then Tengrain shared it at Crooks and Liars. The two shares contributed to the post earning 369 default and 405 raw page views during the month, ranking it second by all measures during February 2025. It continued gaining page views through March 20, 2025, ending the blogging year with 366 default and 427 raw page views to rank 17th overall by the the former, 35th overall by the latter, and 31st among entries posted during the 2024-2025 blogging year.

Stay tuned for Flashback Friday.

Previous posts in this series Previous retrospectives featuring LegalEagle Previous retrospectives about Trump's second term

No comments:

Post a Comment