Showing posts with label Hillary Clinton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hillary Clinton. Show all posts

Thursday, April 17, 2025

LegalEagle contrasts 'Signal War Plans vs. Hillary's Emails' for Throwback Thursday

Happy Throwback Thursday! For today's brief look back, I'm sharing LegalEagle with Liz Dye comparing and contrasting Signal War Plans v.s. Hillary's Emails.

One of these things is not like the other...So when exactly did the military stop classifying time and package of air strikes?
I took a silly look at "Whiskeyleaks" in 'SNL' mocks the Signal group chat in its cold open and Weekend Update, which LegalEagle clipped. It was time I took a serious look at it, along with revisiting a controversy I thought I'd dispensed with nine years ago, Hillary Clinton's emails, although it led to me writing Trump and Putin, a bad bromance, which I last linked to in Kosta, Colbert, and Meyers take closer looks at tariffs on Flashback Friday two weeks ago. I still have my suspicions about that relationship and how it's influencing Donald "Hoover Cleveland" Trump's actions. Also, the accusations against Secretary Clinton turned out to be another example of projection being the Right's favorite defense mechanism. That's turned out to be even more true 13 years later.

Enough of these scandals. Follow over the jump for a retrospective of the top post featuring LegalEagle during the 2024-2025 blogging year.

Monday, August 10, 2020

'Tiger King' vs. 'McMillion$' — big cats and true crime at the Emmy Awards for World Lion Day



Happy World Lion Day and a belated World Tiger Day to my readers! I am celebrating both international days for big cats by fulfulling the promise I made at the end of Mike Pence at Voteview and On The Issues for National Veep Day.
Tomorrow, I plan on continuing my coverage of the Emmy Awards with nominations of shows about animals and nature for World Lion Day. The irony is that the number one show nominated in this category is "Tiger King." Oh, well, I missed World Tiger Day on July 29th again, so tomorrow I'll make up for it. Stay tuned.
With that, I am sharing the Emmy nominations for "Tiger King" today along with the series' major competitors from the 72nd Primetime Creative Arts Emmy Awards on Wikipedia.

Outstanding Documentary or Nonfiction Series
American Masters (PBS)
Hillary (Hulu)
The Last Dance (ESPN)
McMillion$ (HBO)
Tiger King (Netflix)
"Tiger King" may be the last show listed alphabetically, but it's the first in terms of nominations with six. Moving up the list is the next most nominated series, "McMillion$" with five nominations. Continuing to the head of the alphabet, "The Last Dance" has three nominations, while "Hillary" and "American Masters" each have one.

In addition to the true crime angle shared by "Tiger King" and "McMillion$," the two shows also explore politics and government in their own ways. Joe Exotic ran for the Libertarian nomination for Governor of Oklahoma in 2018. He came in last, proving that some candidates are too weird even for the Libertarians. The stars of "McMillion$" are the FBI agents who cracked the case and the FBI, like all law enforcement, are part of the government. Finally, "Hillary" is about the life and career of Hillary Clinton, First Lady, U.S. Senator, and Democratic nominee for President, so it's definitely about politics and government. Meanwhile, "The Last Dance" is about sports, namely Michael Jordan and the Chicago Bulls, and "American Masters" focuses on artists of various kinds. It's a consistent nominee, but hasn't won since 2014.

While I think "Tiger King" is the nominal favorite, both because of its lead in nominations as well as its level of cultural impact, it's not the one my wife and I have been watching, as I already mentioned in 'The Daily Show' and others review movies and series to watch while staying at home during a pandemic.
By the way, the true-crime series "Tiger King" seems to be finding its audience because of people staying home during the pandemic. I've seen tweet after tweet praising it for its entertainment value. So far, I've resisted, as I tweeted "I think my wife would have a problem with the animal cruelty. Instead, we're watching McMillion$ on HBO for our true-crime fix."
Just the same, the trailer for Tiger King: Murder, Mayhem and Madness tempts me to view the first episode.

Among the eccentrics and cult personalities in the stranger-than-fiction world of big cat owners, few stand out more than Joe Exotic, a mulleted, gun-toting polygamist and country western singer who presides over an Oklahoma roadside zoo. Charismatic but misguided, Joe and an unbelievable cast of characters including drug kingpins, conmen, and cult leaders all share a passion for big cats, and the status and attention their dangerous menageries garner. But things take a dark turn when Carole Baskin, an animal activist and owner of a big cat sanctuary, threatens to put them out of business, stoking a rivalry that eventually leads to Joe’s arrest for a murder-for-hire plot, and reveals a twisted tale where the only thing more dangerous than a big cat is its owner.
That looks like as spectacular a train wreck as I thought it would be. No wonder people can't look away and Redditors have made memes like this one.


This is why I think "Tiger King" has the best chance of winning.

Follow over the jump for the rest of the nominations for "Tiger King" and "McMillion$."

Friday, June 8, 2018

News and Documentary Emmy Awards for the seventh year of Crazy Eddie's Motie News

I plan on posting the next installment, which will be on the most read News and Documentary Emmy Awards entries, tomorrow.  Stay tuned for a Flashback Friday retrospective!
That's how I concluded Verge Science updates bees on the endangered species list plus environmental policy for the seventh year of Crazy Eddie's Motie News and that's exactly what I'm doing.

The most read entry in this review of the seventh year of this blog isn't actually about last year's News and Documentary Emmy Awards; it's about this year's.  'Putin's Revenge' on Frontline: Looking forward to next year's Emmys 3 from November 30, 2017 is a prediction of an Emmy nominee.  Even so, it earned 3509 raw page views for the blogging year, enough for it to rank 20th overall and 18th among entries actually posted between March 21, 2017 and March 20, 2018.  It was also the fourth most read entry during December 2017 with 3261 default page views after maxing out at 3360 default and 3393 raw page views on December 19, 2017.  Before being shared at the Join The Coffee Party Movement Facebook page at 11 P.M on December 2, 2017, this post had 105 default page views.  It earned 1557 default page views in the first two hours and ~3000 in the first 24 hours after being shared.  It, along with "Vox explains how proportional representation can solve gerrymandering and help minor parties" and "Ezra Klein of Vox explains how third parties are the Underpants Gnomes of U.S. politics" helped attract 10,073 page views to the blog on December 3, 2017, which set a record for daily page views that lasted until February 5, 2018, when John Oliver on stadiums and NFL cheerleaders for Super Bowl Sunday and Two Emmy winners examine youth and high school football together earned 10,681 page views for a new record.  That high-water mark only lasted a month, when Suit against John Oliver and HBO dismissed helped attract 16,732 page views to the blog, setting a new record for daily page views on March 4, 2018.  That record only lasted a month itself until April 8, 2018, when Facebook knows your political affiliation and much more helped attract 23,947 page views to the blog the day it was shared, the current record.  Sic transit gloria mundi.

I plan on blogging about this entry in September, when I will once again train my gaze on the News and Documentary Emmy nominees.  Until then, follow over the jump for the actual News and Documentary Emmy nominees and winners from last year along with an entry that I missed when I put together The Primetime Emmy Awards for the seventh year of Crazy Eddie's Motie News.

Monday, November 20, 2017

'Putin's Revenge' on Frontline: Looking forward to next year's Emmys 3


Today I conclude the series that began with "Blue Planet II" and continued with "Beyond a Year in Space" by examining Frontline's follow-up to "The Choice 2016," "Putin's Revenge," which was mentioned in the acceptance speech for Outstanding Politics & Government Documentary at the News and Documentary Emmy Awards.*  Watch the trailer from "Frontline."

How did Russian president Vladimir Putin come to see the U.S. as an enemy, and why has he sought to sow distrust in America's democracy? From filmmaker Michael Kirk and the team behind "The Choice 2016" comes this epic, two-part documentary examining Putin's rise, rule and motivations, and the American responses.
Follow over the jump for three clips from the documentary itself.

Friday, November 3, 2017

Frontline's "The Choice 2016" wins Outstanding Politics & Government Documentary


I concluded 'Thank You For Playing' wins Outstanding Arts & Culture Documentary by telling my readers to "Stay tuned for the two other winners, which are about last year's presidential election."   Today's entry is about the winner of Outstanding Politics & Government Documentary, Frontline's "The Choice 2016."  Watch as Byron Pitts announces the winner and presents the trophy.


Yes, Omarosa sounded ridiculous then, but she doesn't sound quite as mockable now.  It doesn't help that I used to be a big reality competition show fan, enough so that I was a moderator on a reality TV discussion forum back in 2005 and 2006, so I became familiar with her as a villainous contestant on "The Apprentice."  That made it difficult for me to take her seriously.  I'm sure I'm not alone.  Now, Americans have to take her much more seriously, which is a frightening thought.

Speaking of Omarosa, here she is along with Roger Stone and others in the full trailer for "The Choice."

FRONTLINE’s dual biography investigates Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, and what has shaped them.

FRONTLINE’s acclaimed series "The Choice" returns this fall with a two-hour film investigating what has shaped Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, where they came from, how they lead and why they want to take on one of the most difficult jobs imaginable. From veteran FRONTLINE filmmaker Michael Kirk, "The Choice 2016" premieres Tues., 9/27 on PBS and online at pbs.org/frontline.
That made me want to watch the whole program, even though it wouldn't be a useful now as it would have been a year ago.  In case my readers and I ever do, Frontline has it on YouTube and has allowed it to be embedded.  Here is The Choice 2016 (full film) | FRONTLINE.

The dueling stories of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump as they battle for the presidency.

Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are two of the most polarizing presidential candidates in modern history. Veteran FRONTLINE filmmaker Michael Kirk goes beyond the headlines to investigate what has shaped these two candidates, where they came from, how they lead and why they want one of the most difficult jobs imaginable.
While it will no longer influence the election, this documentary can still help people understand what happened and why, as well as gaining greater insight into Trump, who is still the President of the United States, whether my readers and I like it or not.

On another note, this is the sixth winner from PBS I've profiled.  The other five are:
Along with "The Choice," these six are half of PBS's 12 winning shows, the most of any outlet.  That high level of quality tells me I really should support public broadcasting more, especially since funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting was threatened in Trump's initial proposed budget.  Fortunately, Congress retained funding in the current budget, but the potential threat still lurks.

Tomorrow's entry will also be about an Emmy winner that examined Trump.  Stay tuned.

Monday, April 10, 2017

WOOD-TV on fake news shared on Twitter in Michigan during the election


I began the month by sharing a video from DNews/Seeker with my readers explaining why people fall for fake news.  Today, I'm offering last Thursday's clips from WOOD-TV about the prevalence of fake news on Twitter before last fall's election.  How prevalent?  This prevalent: Fake news accounted for 25 percent of shared campaign links.

A study by London's Oxford University shows that a big chunk of political stories shared out on Twitter before the election in Michigan was fake.
Here is the next segment: Oxford study: ‘Fake news’ flooded Michigan in November.

A study done at London’s Oxford University took a look at election-related posts on social media Goliath Twitter and found that a big chunk of campaign-related news shared in Michigan was of the fake news variety.
Good lord.  As the Seattle Times headline read two weeks ago, "The information war is real, and we’re losing it."

Sunday, April 2, 2017

Entertainment and the election for the sixth year of Crazy Eddie's Motie News


"Stay tuned for a retrospective on entertainment and the election," I wrote to conclude Minor parties for the sixth year of Crazy Eddie's Motie News.  Since today is Sunday, when I usually post my weekly entertainment feature, it's time to post that retropsective.

The seventh most read entry of the blogging year just finished and the eighth most read of all time is Tyrion Lannister ties Sanders and beats Clinton and Trump" from May 1, 2016, which earned 3421 page views, 3564 according to the raw counter.  Once again, I'm going to be a good environmentalist and recycle the story of its rise from Monthly meta for May 2016.
"Tyrion Lannister ties Sanders and beats Clinton and Trump" from May 1, 2016 may have come in second in page views with 3422 (3486 according to the raw counter), but it tied for first as the most liked on Google+ with 4 pluses.  It earned the page views from being shared at the Coffee Party Facebook page, which helped draw 897 page views to the site in the first hour and 3472 page views in the first day from being posted at the Coffee Party Facebook page.  It got 3000+ page views in the first 24 hours.  I later shared it at both Kunstler's and Greer's blogs.  Those links didn't add much to the readership.  It got its pluses from being shared at the political groups on Google+.  It ended the month as the third most read entry of all time, knocking "James Robertson ABC's Person of the Week" out of the top ten.  That had been the top post for the fourth year of this blog.  Sic transit gloria mundi.
I wrote in Popular entries from the back catalog for the fifth year of Crazy Eddie's Motie News that "James Robertson ABC's Person of the Week...was pushed out by Tyrion Lannister ties Sanders and beats Clinton and Trump in May 2016, a story that I'll repeat in detail next year."  It turns out that I had already written it and just repeated it.  That's an example of a point I make to my students; recycling saves energy.

It also turns out that I have no record of having shared the link at Greer's blog before I wrote the above, not that it would likely have made a difference, so I have retract that claim.  However, I did share it as a comment to Send Out the Clowns at Kunstler's blog, where I wrote the following.
In advance of last week's premiere of Season 6 of "Game of Thrones," SurveyMonkey conducted a poll and found that Tyrion Lannister ties Sanders and beats Clinton and Trump.  The show's fans preferred Sanders to both Clinton and Trump.  That a fictional character might win an election is par for the course.  Last December, Reuters found that both Yoda and Obi-Wan Kenobi would beat Clinton and Trump.  Even Darth Vader would beat Trump!

That's not all.  Vox looked at the candidates and figured out who they'd be in Westeros.  Clinton, no surprise, would be Circei Lannister.  Trump wouldn't be any known character, but he'd fit right in with the Lannisters, too, maybe as Joffrey all grown up.  Americans want a Lannister, but poor Tyrion won't be on the ballot.  Instead, Trump is coming and he's building a wall.
Trump as Joffrey all grown up also made an appearance in Hollywood gets political at the Golden Globes, which rounds out the conceit of last year's candidates as "Game of Thrones" characters.

Follow over the jump for more about the intersection of politics and entertainment from the previous blogging year.

Monday, March 27, 2017

John Oliver: Top posts for the sixth year of Crazy Eddie's Motie News


At the end of WXYZ on Marche du Nain Rouge 2017, I teased my readers by telling them to "Stay tuned for an entertainment-themed retrospective featuring the top entry of last year."  The hint was the backside of John Oliver blowing up 2016.  Sure enough, the top two posts of last year both featured John Oliver.

The most read entry of the two was Last Week Tonight examines Clinton and Trump foundations after winning three Emmy Awards from September 27, 2016.  It earned 7947 page views according to the default counter, 8226 according to the raw counter, by the end of March 20, 2017.  Not only was it the top post of last year, it's currently the top post of all time on the blog.  Here's the story from the notes for October 2016, when it was the top post for the month as well as the winner of the Revenge of the Back Catalog Trophy.*

The entry earned 2672 page views in the first two hours after being shared at the Coffee Party USA Facebook page, 1942 in the first hour.  It helped attract nearly 1995 page views to the blog the first hour and 792 the second.  In the first two hours, it rocketed up to 6th place, knocking Clinton wins the news media while Sanders wins the Internet out of the all-time top ten and passing PBS Newshour examines gerrymandering in Maryland and North Carolina, which had only occupied sixth place for a few hours.  Overnight, it powered up the rankings until it was in third by 9 AM the next day.  It ended up in first place after 24 hours with 7406 views during the first 24 hours.  It also helped contribute to the best single day in the blog's history with 7930 page views.  It ended October with 7947 page views after reaching a maximum of 7997, 8176 according to the raw counter, at 7:59 PM on October 26, 2016.  The tendency of the default counter to shrink page views over time strikes again!


The second most read entry of the year and third of all time also featured John Oliver, John Oliver on feelings over facts and Colbert on Trumpiness.  It ended the blogging year with 5059 page views, 6206 according to the raw counter.  I'll be a good environmentalist and recycle the relevant paragraph from Best August so far and other monthly meta to explain how it got its page views.
"John Oliver on feelings over facts and Colbert on Trumpiness" from July 25, 2016 won both the top post and Revenge of the Back Catalog trophies with 6061 entries during the month.  The entry also rose to second on the all-time top ten list with 6099 page views, 6139 according to the raw counter, by the end of July.  As I documented in Popular entries from the back catalog for the fifth year of Crazy Eddie's Motie News, it knocked Eye spy the gas price rollercoaster about to coast down like a parachute out of the all-time top ten.  Like the previous two entries, it earned its page view[s] by being shared at the Coffee Party Facebook page, where it earned more than 5700 page views in 24 hours.  Before being shared, it had 117 page views.  Sharing it helped draw 5861 page views to the blog the day it was posted, 1325 in the first hour.
The list of retrospectives about top posts at the end of this entry shows that I've never featured two most read entries for the year in the same post and only once have I included posts on the same theme as the top post, and that was the "other" top post for the year.  Congratulations to John Oliver for achieving a first on this blog!

I'm not done with the subject.  Follow over the jump for more posts built around John Oliver that made last year's Top 40.**

Monday, February 27, 2017

'Hillary's America' outstinks 'Batman v Superman' for Worst Picture of 2016


I promised I'd get to the Razzie winners this week at the end of 'Suicide Squad' vs. 'Deadpool' at the Razzies and Oscars.  It's time to keep that promise.  Take it away, Razzies!

Razzie Members from all over the world have cast their votes and the "winners" have been announced for the best of the worst.
The results make me happy.
I expect "Batman v. Superman" will win, but I am rooting for "Hillary’s America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party" instead.  That movie is my pick for worst political movie of the year.
That prediction and hope was for Worst Screenplay, which "Batman v Superman" actually won, making that sentence a successful prediction, but I am very happy that Dinesh D'Souza's attempt at a documentary beat out the one of the worst big-budget superhero flicks of the past year for Worst Picture, as well as D'Souza proving worse as himself than both Ben Affleck's Batman and Henry Cavill's Superman and worse than Zak Snyder as a director.  Finally, the movie's lead actress Becky Turner won Worst Actress for a total of four Razzies, tying "Batman v Superman."

Speaking of the Caped Crusader and Man of Steel, they were judged to be the worst combo in major Hollywood films last year.  It's the fault of the writing, but yes, the two deserved it.  They had really lousy chemistry on screen except when Wonder Woman was present, so she gets the credit.

As for the two remaining awards, allow me to brag.  First, my comments on Jesse Eisenberg being nominated for Worst Supporting Actor as Lex Luthor.
Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor was worse than Leto as Joker...My wife and I agreed he wasn't Lex Luthor, who should be colder and more openly calculating, but a more organized version of The Joker who had a goal beyond "watching the world burn."
While I expressed doubts that Eisenberg was worse than the supporting actors in "Zoolander 2," he did deserve the nomination and didn't say he wouldn't win.  I guess the "Zoolander 2" vote was split and Eisenberg's Luthor was that bad.

Next, my observation in 'Superman vs. Batman' buries 'Zootopia' in rubble that I repeated in Razzie nominations confirm my guesses as to worst speculative fiction movies of 2017.
"Dawn of Justice" may end up with the same kind of dubious distinction "Fifty Shades of Grey" earned--nominated for both an Oscar (Special Effects) and at least one Razzie (Worst Reboot/Ripoff/Sequel).
And it won Worst Reboot/Ripoff/Sequel.  I called it a year ago.

Finally, why were these movies considered terrible?  "Batman v Superman" was judged bad because didn't meet expectations, but the audience probably didn't have much in the way of expectations for D'Souza's hack job on Clinton, other than it being a hack job.  While it met those, which was enough to make it the biggest grossing documentary of the past year, it failed to meet every other standard for artistry and veracity.  At least D'Souza showed up to "own his bad," proving he has some sense of humor, but he doesn't seem realize it's not the Hollywood insiders who were voting, it's the fans.  Dude, Hollywood doesn't hate your movie, America hates your movie.

Thursday, December 1, 2016

The Michigan recount is on!


When "I promise[d] to return to reality after midnight" at the end of One last People's Choice nominees entry about songs in speculative fiction movies, I was hoping to post that Jill Stein had indeed filed for a recount in Michigan yesterday.  I got my wish, as WOOD-TV reported last night Jill Stein officially requests presidential vote recount in Michigan.

The first statewide recount Michigan has had to complete in 60 years could begin as early as Friday.
WXYZ has more on the Stein campaign's rationale along with quotes from the press conference in Michigan recount to get underway

Michigan will soon be recounting the presidential election.
It's on!  As the WOOD-TV reporter noted, all three states would have to flip to Clinton to change the outcome, which is exceedingly unlikely.  However, it's worth doing just as an audit of the election.

Follow over the jump for more details in reports from Tuesday.

Sunday, November 13, 2016

A final 'Hallelujah' for Leonard Cohen


No one voted for the topic of today's entertanment entry, so I'm counting my own "write-in" for Leonard Cohen, whose song "Everybody Knows" I've used twice on this blog.  ABC News has the story in Leonard Cohen Dead at 82 | Remembering the 'Hallelujah' Songwriter.

Leonard Cohen, the Canadian poet, novelist and musician best known for writing the song "Hallelujah," has died.
Cohen had been compared to Bob Dylan, who won the 2016 Nobel Prize for Literature.  Some people were even suggesting that he should get the next one.  That won't happen; Nobel Prizes are not given to people who are already dead at the time of decision.

That written, Cohen's artistry and fame will live on, as it did last Saturday night, when Election Week Cold Open - SNL featured his most famous song, "Hallelujah."

Hillary Clinton (Kate McKinnon) performs Leonard Cohen's "Hallelujah."
No, I'm not giving up.  As Charles Blow wrote "I respect the presidency; I do not respect this president-elect. I cannot. Count me among the resistance...Power must be challenged, constantly. That begins today."

Tuesday, November 8, 2016

Katy Perry roars for Hillary Clinton


It's Election Day and I've run out of things to say after this long campaign, so I'm just going to post this.


As Charles Pierce wrote the other day, Nobody Who Followed This Election Can Say It Hasn't Been a Show.
On Saturday night, in a band shed on the north side of the city, Katy Perry put on a show in support of the campaign of Hillary Rodham Clinton. (Clinton has been using Perry's "Roar" as her walk-up music for her entire campaign. This is unfortunate for any decent song because, by the end of the campaign, it can make even HRC's most fervent supporters flee in horror. Hell, Donald Trump even has me wincing at "You Can't Always Get What You Want." I didn't think that was possible.)
...
Katy Perry sang very well on Saturday night. I didn't know many of the songs but people left the shed happy. Maybe they all went out knocking doors and making phone calls. Maybe many of them didn't. But nobody who followed this election can say it hasn't been a show. Are we not entertained?
Everyone, go vote if you haven't done so already, whether by absentee ballot, mail-in ballot, or early voting.  I'll be voting today, then watching the election returns.   I'll be back when the votes are counted.  See you then!

Thursday, November 3, 2016

Surrogates galore in Michigan as campaign heats up


Since I posted Clinton regains double-digit lead over Trump in Michigan, the race here has tightened.   Epic-MRA, the same pollster I quoted in that last post more recently reported Clinton with a seven-point margin over Trump, while other polls have Clinton leading with by as little as one percent.  It's enough for FiveThirtyEight to lower Clinton's odds of winning Michigan from 86.2% last month to 78% now.  While that's still better than the 71.4% probability early in September, it's enough to attract the attention of both campaigns.  WXYZ had the story Tuesday in Michigan turns [in]to a battleground state for presidential election.

With just a week until election day, Michigan has turned into a battleground state with candidates and supporters fighting for Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.
Hillary Clinton on Friday and Ivanka Trump yesterday.  WXYZ caught the latter visit along with one by Bill Clinton in Presidential campaigns push to win Michigan.

Former President Bill Clinton made a surprise visit to huddle with Detroit leaders about getting out the vote for his wife. Ivanka Trump also campaigned in Metro Detroit for her father.
The western side of the state also got its share of presidential proxies.  Follow over the jump for two reports from WOOD-TV.

Wednesday, October 26, 2016

John Oliver and Keith Olbermann examine minor party candidates


Earlier this month, I shared how Stephen Colbert and Seth Meyers mocked Gary Johnson and Bill Maher warned against voting for him even as newspapers endorsed him.  I pointed out this was exactly what should be happenning in a good year for minor party candidates.

Now, John Oliver spreads the attention and the mirth not only at Johnson, but also Jill Stein and some other minor party candidates for President in Third Parties.

Third party candidates want to be serious contenders, so John Oliver considers them seriously as potential presidents.
What I saw actually made me think better of Gary Johnson.  First, he proved he was smarter and better prepared than Rick Perry.  Asking Perry what three departments he'd eliminate led to his infamous "Oops" moment.  At least Johnson could name them off the top of his head.  Second, I didn't know he climbed Mt. Everest.  Regardless of his politics, that's impressive.  Third, he actually has the right attitude of humility about his accomplishment; one does not conquer the mountain, one merely survives the experience of visiting.  Just the same, his metaphor for expressing himself is downright strange--but that's Johnson.

As for Stein, Oliver shows she can do more musically than play the bongos; she sings better than I expected, although AutoTune may have done wonders for her.  However, Oliver exposes how she is even more tolerant of bad weird ideas than Johnson.  I found that disappointing.

While Oliver came to the conclusion that all of the candidates are flawed, so voting for Johnson, Stein, "Joe Exotic," or any of the candidates in last night's Free and Equal debate will not be any better than voting for Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump, Keith Olbermann actively warned his viewers against voting for any minor party candidate in This Election is Too Important Not to Vote for Hillary.

Don't like Hillary Clinton? Desperate to change the system? That's fine. But those impulses must wait.
I'm not quite that adamant.  If any of my readers live in a safely Red or Blue state, voting for Johnson, Stein, Darrell Castle, or Evan McMullin will not matter; go right ahead, you're throwing away your vote harmlessly and in the case of Johnson will likely end up qualifying the Libertarians for public election funding.  On the other hand, those who live in Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, or Ohio have votes too valuable to waste.  Think hard about your vote this time, and then work to change the system between elections.  That's more likely to get the results minor party voters say they want.

As for Keith, he may be scared, but at least he remembered his tag line--"watch this space."

Saturday, October 22, 2016

People stream Janet Jackson's 'Nasty' in response to Trump insulting Clinton


I'm posting the Sunday entertainment entry a day early because tomorrow is Wester, so I'm dedicating the Sunday entry to wish my readers a Happy Wester.  For today, I'm following up on an entertainment angle of the third debate, the reaction to Donald Trump calling Hillary Clinton "such a nasty woman."  Wochit Entertainment reports Janet Jackson’s ‘Nasty’ Streams Go Up After Donald's Debate Comment.

On Wednesday Night the final presidential debate took place with Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. This time Donald did not cease to surprise people when he referred to Clinton as a “nasty woman”. However after the debate streams of Janet Jackson’s song “Nasty” skyrocketed on Spotify. Streams of the 1986 song went up 250 percent overnight. Clinton supporters embraced the term. They took the term back as a sign of empowerment. Donald made the comment as the two debated over Social Security and Medicare.
It also inspired fan parodies like this Hillary Clinton, Janet Jackson, Donald Trump Nasty Remix.

Clinton is a Nasty woman according to Donald Trump. Nobody knows Nasty the way Janet knows Nasty.
That only took a day to appear on YouTube.  If the election inspires more silly entertainment like this, it might almost be worth it.

Monday, October 17, 2016

Bill Maher shows how life imitates dystopian science fiction


Last Friday, Bill Maher gave a good demonstration of how science fiction speaks to our current anxieties in New Rule: A Bone to Pick with Undecided Voters.  Start paying close attention at the four minute mark to see how life imitates art and why that might actually offer us hope.


I wasn't the only one to catch this.  Greg Evans of Deadline Hollywood did as well in Bill Maher: Hollywood Blockbusters Predicted Trumpocalypse.
Bill Maher gave props to Hollywood – particularly its sci-fi visions – for showing voters both the end of our world and a way to salvation: In his episode-closing New Rules comic monologue, the host of HBO’s Real Time With Bill Maher last night asked what movies like Divergent, The Hunger Games, Elysium, Snowpiercer and The Giver have in common.

Can you guess? How about post-apocalyptic worlds rescued and controlled by a “cold, technocratic boss lady in a pantsuit?”

Touting Hollywood’s uncanny ability to predict the future – Star Trek‘s flip-phones, Minority Report‘s touch-screens, Morgan Freeman as president – Maher then reminded viewers about the big screen’s recent nuclear obsession. “Folks, blowing up the world is something that could actually happen,” he said, setting up the bit in earnest.
I couldn't have said it better myself.  Here's to being with Bill Maher and supporting the “cold, technocratic boss lady in a pantsuit.”  It beats being led by Immortan Joe!

Tuesday, October 11, 2016

Trump threatens to 'Lock Her Up!'


After watching the Republican Convention, I left a comment on The Morning After, Day 2, and Why I Can't Watch 2 in response to P.M. Carpenter.
Christie was another of last night's pseudoconservative luminaries, who also delivered a frothing denunciation of Crooked Hillary, "smil[ing]" as the arena's neofascistic mob "erupted in chants of 'LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP!," reports Slate's Michelle Goldberg.
"'LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP!'" Given Manfort's history, that takes on a chilling meaning. Here's what Wikipedia wrote about his involvement in Ukraine.

"In 2010, under Manafort's tutelage, the opposition leader put the Orange Revolution on trial, campaigning against its leaders' management of a weak economy. Returns from the presidential election gave Yanukovych a narrow win over Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, a leader of the 2004 demonstrations. Yanukovych owed his comeback in Ukraine's presidential election to a drastic makeover of his political persona and, people in his party say, that makeover was engineered in part by his American consultant, Manafort."

And what did Yanukovych do to Tymoshenko after he won? Lock her up.
After Manafort left the campaign, in part because of his ties to Yanukovych, I felt less worried about such an outcome and decided that I wasn't going to recycle that comment at this blog.  Then Trump threatened to prosecute Clinton over emails at Sunday night's debate.

During the second presidential debate, Donald Trump said that if he wins the election, he will appoint a special prosecutor to look into Hillary Clinton's email "situation."
Eep!  Trump threatened to "lock her up!"  Manafort may be gone, but Bannon and others from Breitbart have replaced him, and they have continued this part of his legacy.  That's another Weimar moment that reinforces the idea that 2016 may not be 1968, but Trump is worse than Wallace.  I'll let Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo speak for me by explaining what this Weimar Moment meant to him.
I don't think we can discuss this debate as citizens, take stock of it as a country, without noting that this is certainly the first time one candidate has openly threatened to jail the other candidate. Trump said openly that he would instruct the Justice Department to open a new investigation of Clinton and that he'd make sure it ended with her imprisonment. That's something we expect it kleptocracies and thin democracies where electoral defeat can mean exile, imprisonment or death.

Such a ferocious claim, one that puts our whole constitutional order on its head, is not something that can be easily undone. That's the ranting threat of a would-be strongman and dictator The threat itself is like a bell that can't be un-rung. Through the course of what was often an ugly debate, I was thinking a lot of the destructiveness of this entire campaign, virtually all of which stems from Trump's transgressive, norm-demolishing behavior. It's a topic we'll have to return to in the ed blog and one the country is going to need to wrestle with. None of this is going to disappear after November 8th. These are slashing wounds to the country's political fabric that will at best leave tremendous scar tissue we'll still see for decades.
That was an early response and a rather restrained one, although Marshall was rattled enough to forget some of his punctuation.  The next morning, Keith Olbermann unleashed his full fury on the topic in Jailing Hillary!? Trump’s Outrageous Case for Dictatorship.

Floating his new plan to lock up his political rival, Donald Trump borrows a page from the Putin playbook.
Thank you, Keith, for saying everything I was thinking along with everything I should have been thinking.  I've missed you and I'm glad you're back.  It's times like this that I need you and the country needs you, too.

Friday, October 7, 2016

Clinton regains double-digit lead over Trump in Michigan


Last month, the polling news read Clinton lead over Trump shrinking in Michigan.  Eep!  This month, actually yesterday, the same poll gave Clinton an 11% lead over Trump in a four-way poll including both Johnson and Stein.  WXYZ has the story in Clinton leads Trump in new Presidential poll.

Hillary Clinton is now leading Donald Trump by double digits in our newest Presidential poll.
The Detroit Free Press explains how Clinton's lead built back up among key demographic groups in the follow passage from Poll: Clinton takes 11-point lead over Trump in Michigan.
[The previous poll showed] Clinton’s support among black voters in Michigan dropped to 74% —  far below the 95% of support the last Democratic nominee, Obama, got in the last election — and 14% undecided. But this poll showed 86% of black voters supporting her and Trump getting no more than 2% of that vote, despite his outreach in visits to Detroit and Flint. Only 5% of African-American voters remained undecided, the poll said.

Trump’s chances of winning in Michigan and elsewhere are further hurt by an inability to attract more support from white people, as well: The poll indicated that Clinton was essentially tied among whites, with her leading 37%-36, compared to 11% for Johnson and 13% undecided. In the last election, exit polls showed Republican nominee Mitt Romney beating Obama among whites in Michigan by 11 percentage points — and still losing by 9 percentage points overall in the state

Three weeks ago, Trump also had taken a clear step toward neutralizing the gender gap facing his campaign, taking a 5-percentage-point lead among men in Michigan and cutting Clinton’s clear lead among women to 10 percentage points.

In this poll, however —  following Clinton’s debate where she blasted Trump for calling 1996 Miss Universe Alicia Machado “Miss Piggy” and “Miss Housekeeping” —  Clinton had staked a 20-percentage-point margin with women — 48%-28% among the biggest single voting bloc in the state. She has continued to raise issues of Trump criticizing women over their looks on the campaign trail.

And while Clinton had seen a decline in support among voters ages 18-34   in the last Michigan poll, she’s now back where she was with them post-convention, with a 44%-22% lead over Trump and Johnson getting 21%. Clinton also held leads among every other age demographic. In vote-rich metro Detroit, Clinton’s support was back over 50%: She led Trump in Wayne, Oakland and Macomb counties as a bloc by 55%-25%, though Trump still held leads in central, west and northern Michigan.

Trump had been expected to do best with voters with a high school diploma or less education, but after he held a 4-percentage-point edge with those voters last month, Clinton is now ahead. She  had regained a clear lead, 41%-32%. She also reclaimed a lead among self-described independent voters, 27%-24%, though what may be most significant about that group is that their number of undecideds jumped from 20% to 31%; and their support for Johnson dropped, from 23% to 14%, as the third-party nominee had difficulties identifying the war-torn city of Aleppo in Syria and answering a question about foreign leaders.
All good news.  As a result, FiveThirtyEight now lists Clinton's odds of winning Michigan at 86.2%, much higher than the 71.4% probability early in September, although not as good as 93% in August.  Here's to her chances improving!

Monday, October 3, 2016

Newspaper endorsements roll in while comedians laugh at Gary Johnson


I wrote 2016 could be a good year for minor party candidates and then made a prediction of what that would most likely look like.
FiveThirtyEight asked Could An Independent Candidate Succeed In 2016?  Of all the answers to the question, I agreed most with Harry Enten, who said "this year pretty much meets all the criteria for at least a moderately successful third-party candidacy."  For me, that means that the Libertarians and possibly the Greens could reach the threshold of five percent of the popular vote to qualify for public financing in 2020.  The Constitution Party does not have ballot access in enough states to meet that criterion.  It's very unlikely that even one of the minor parties will qualify for the debates with the major party candidates.  As Gary Johnson pointed out, that requires fifteen percent in several polls before the debates.   While minor parties have earned Electoral College votes before, that happened when they had concentrated regional strength, such as the Dixiecrats and the American Independent Party, and could win pluralities in three-party contests.  Neither the Libertarians nor the Greens meet that criterion; their support is more diffuse.  Consequently, none of the minor parties will win the presidency, but they'll certainly overperform compared to any election since 2000 and possibly even 1996, but not 1992.  None of these candidates is Ross Perot.  Even he didn't win any Electoral College votes.
So far, those predictions are panning out.  First, Johnson did not get into the debates, as he did not get 15% in the polls in time.  Second, as of today, FiveThirtyEight projects Johnson will earn 7.6% of the vote in November.  That would be the best showing for a minor party candidate since Perot in 1996, but not better; Perot earned 8.4% in that election.  As I wrote, Johnson is not Perot.  Third, FiveThirtyEight is also predicting only a 2.9% probability that Johnson will earn any electoral votes, most likely in his home state of New Mexico.  My forecast, as far as it went, is coming true.  That written, there are two results of Johnson's success that I didn't foresee, the newspaper endorsements and the comedic reaction.

First, the endorsements.  Politico quoted the Chicago Tribune endorsing Gary Johnson for president and listed Johnson's other endorsements.
“We would rather recommend a principled candidate for president — regardless of his or her prospects for victory — than suggest that voters cast ballots for such disappointing major-party candidates,” the editorial board wrote.

“We reject the cliche that a citizen who chooses a principled third-party candidate is squandering his or her vote,” the endorsement continued. “…We offer this endorsement to encourage voters who want to feel comfortable with their choice. Who want to vote for someone they can admire.”
...
It’s the fifth newspaper endorsement that Johnson, who is polling in the single digits, has received from traditionally right-leaning editorial boards. On Thursday, The Detroit News, which has until this year always endorsed Republican candidates for the presidency, endorsed Johnson. The Libertarian candidate also has received endorsements from the New Hampshire Union-Leader, the Richmond Times-Dispatch and the Winston-Salem Journal.
In contrast, the closest Trump has to a major metropolitain newspaper endorsement comes from the New York Post.  Five endorsements to maybe one.  That's not a result I would have expected, even from the Detroit News.  Speaking of which, WXYZ reported on Detroit News endorses Libertarian Gary Johnson for president.  Roll video!


Get used to that clip.  It will show up again and again over the jump as Stephen Colbert, Seth Meyers, Bill Maher, and Sarah Silverman laugh at Johnson.

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

Last Week Tonight examines Clinton and Trump foundations after winning three Emmy Awards

While I was writing about "Game of Thrones" and "Orphan Black" winning Emmy Awards, another show was winning three statuettes.  "Last Week Tonight" earned Outstanding Talk Variety Series, Outstanding Writing for a Variety Series, and Outstanding Picture Editing for a Variety Series.  Congratulations!

After winning the awards, the series returned Sunday with an examination of the Trump Foundation and comparing it to the Clinton Foundation.  It demonstrated that the show deserved all of its awards.  Watch Scandals: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO) and see if I'm wrong.

The 2016 presidential race is teeming with raisins. Sorry…scandals.
Vox quoted the full raisin metaphor.
"Ethical failings in a politician are like raisins in a cookie," Oliver added. "They shouldn’t be there. They disgust people. But most politicians have at least a few raisins.

"Hillary is a cookie like this one," Oliver said, pulling out one raisin cookie. "She arguably has more raisins than average. There’s probably 10 of those little fuckers in there."

"But we all need to remember that when it comes to Donald Trump, this is the amount of raisins that he represents," Oliver explained, as hundreds of raisins rained on top of him. "The man is a fucking raisin monsoon. He is ethically compromised to an almost unprecedented degree."
...
"If you don’t like raisins, I get it — they’re disgusting," Oliver said. "But unfortunately, this November, you’re going to have to swallow 10, or we’re all going to be eating this shit for years."
I like raisins, but I don't like them that much!

I'll resume posting about the actual news and documentary Emmy winners tomorrow, although it felt like I was just writing about the best news program on TV today, even if it is considered entertainment.  Once again, congratulations on the show's three Emmy Awards!